1 Everything you ever wanted to know about Linux 2.6 -stable releases.
2
3 Rules on what kind of patches are accepted, and which ones are not, into the
4 "-stable" tree:
5
6 - It must be obviously correct and tested.
7 - It cannot be bigger than 100 lines, with context.
8 - It must fix only one thing.
9 - It must fix a real bug that bothers people (not a, "This could be a
10 problem..." type thing).
11 - It must fix a problem that causes a build error (but not for things
12 marked CONFIG_BROKEN), an oops, a hang, data corruption, a real
13 security issue, or some "oh, that's not good" issue. In short, something
14 critical.
15 - New device IDs and quirks are also accepted.
16 - No "theoretical race condition" issues, unless an explanation of how the
17 race can be exploited is also provided.
18 - It cannot contain any "trivial" fixes in it (spelling changes,
19 whitespace cleanups, etc).
20 - It must follow the Documentation/SubmittingPatches rules.
21 - It or an equivalent fix must already exist in Linus' tree. Quote the
22 respective commit ID in Linus' tree in your patch submission to -stable.
23
24
25 Procedure for submitting patches to the -stable tree:
26
27 - Send the patch, after verifying that it follows the above rules, to
28 stable@kernel.org.
29 - The sender will receive an ACK when the patch has been accepted into the
30 queue, or a NAK if the patch is rejected. This response might take a few
31 days, according to the developer's schedules.
32 - If accepted, the patch will be added to the -stable queue, for review by
33 other developers and by the relevant subsystem maintainer.
34 - If the stable@kernel.org address is added to a patch, when it goes into
35 Linus's tree it will automatically be emailed to the stable team.
36 - Security patches should not be sent to this alias, but instead to the
37 documented security@kernel.org address.
38
39
40 Review cycle:
41
42 - When the -stable maintainers decide for a review cycle, the patches will be
43 sent to the review committee, and the maintainer of the affected area of
44 the patch (unless the submitter is the maintainer of the area) and CC: to
45 the linux-kernel mailing list.
46 - The review committee has 48 hours in which to ACK or NAK the patch.
47 - If the patch is rejected by a member of the committee, or linux-kernel
48 members object to the patch, bringing up issues that the maintainers and
49 members did not realize, the patch will be dropped from the queue.
50 - At the end of the review cycle, the ACKed patches will be added to the
51 latest -stable release, and a new -stable release will happen.
52 - Security patches will be accepted into the -stable tree directly from the
53 security kernel team, and not go through the normal review cycle.
54 Contact the kernel security team for more details on this procedure.
55
56
57 Review committee:
58
59 - This is made up of a number of kernel developers who have volunteered for
60 this task, and a few that haven't.
This page was automatically generated by the
LXR engine.
Visit the LXR main site for more
information.